My account: Login | Sign Up
Loading... 

Nehalem | Topic profile

Topic profile page for Nehalem. This page has aggregated data from forum posts, threads, listings, online discussions, newsgroups, messageboards, and other online sources which contain user generated content for the term: Nehalem.
Topic "Nehalem" was discussed 42,056 times on 651 sites in last 3 months
Search discussions about discussions, forums, images, videos, about "Nehalem" on BoardReader!
 

BoardReader Trendy!

Topic 1:

Topic 2:

Topic 3:

Domain Profile
Domain:

Posting activity graph on nehalem:

Posts by:  day  week  month 

 

Related topics:


nehalem was discussed on the following sites:

Forum de Luxx Forum de Luxx - 9,792 Forum de Luxx - site profile
FORUM HardWare.fr FORUM HardWare.fr - 8,566 FORUM HardWare.fr - site profile
XtremeSystems Forums XtremeSystems Forums - 3,946 XtremeSystems Forums - site profile
3DCenter Forum 3DCenter Forum - 1,675 3DCenter Forum - site profile
Mac Forums - Mac News and Rumor Discussion Mac Forums - Mac News and Rumor Discussion - 1,206 Mac Forums - Mac News and Rumor Discussion - site profile

 

Related threads on nehalem:

DrakeAnubis
Intel Nehalem Processors will put 8 cores in consumer...  Twitter / DrakeAnubis - site profile DrakeAnubis
 - forum profile  Go to this thread  Intel Nehalem Processors will put 8 cores in consumer desktops
Ars Technica News & Discussion Intel's 3.2GHz monster Nehalem roars onto the scene  Ars OpenForum 3.0b - site profile Ars Technica News & Discussion - forum profile  Go to this thread  Intel's 3.2GHz monster Nehalem roars onto the scene
Neo Win Exclusive: Nehalem at 2.9GHz and X58: Today, we have the...  Twitter / Neo_Win - site profile Neo Win - forum profile  Go to this thread  Exclusive: Nehalem at 2.9GHz and X58: Today, we have the exclusive look at a full fledged X58 system. The.. http://tinyurl.com/5nlrvn
Intel adds more Nehalem CPUs to server line; to phase...  CommunicAsia 2008, Computex Taipei 2008 coverage, AMD 790GX, MCP7A, NVIDIA GeForce 260 GTX, HD 4850 HD 4870 at OCWORKBENCH - site profile Computex Taipei 2008 - forum profile  Go to this thread  Intel adds more Nehalem CPUs to server line; to phase out more notebook CPUs
Ars Technica
Nehalem Skulltrail to run on X58 - http://ping.fm/DrDMm  Twitter / arstechnica - site profile Ars Technica
 - forum profile  Go to this thread  Nehalem Skulltrail to run on X58 - http://ping.fm/DrDMm

Latest threads on nehalem:

Intel
Started 5 days, 5 hours ago (2009-01-02 21:18:23)  by spaarky
What you'll notice with Nehalem is that the more it distances itself from the competition in benchmarks, the more power it will dissipate, because it's getting the work done faster. This is actually what you'd like to see in a processor design, but what I expect to happen is that most reviews will take the most favorable performance benchmarks for Deneb, and then thrash Nehalem in a "CPU Load" ...
Source: Investors Hub - Discussion Groups More from this site Investors Hub - Discussion Groups - site profile 
Forum:  Intel  Intel - forum profile
Thread:  Show this thread (1 post) More from What you'll notice with Nehalem is that the  Thread Thread info: What you'll notice with Nehalem is that the Size: 994 bytes
Related Threads: Same Site | All Sites
Customize:  Customize "What you'll notice with Nehalem is that the :: Intel :: Investors Hub - Discussion Groups"
Intel
Started 1 week, 1 day ago (2008-12-30 12:40:08)  by Saturn V
Better relative performance of Nehalem vs Opteron I think that the reason why the 2S Nehalem performs equivalently or better than 4S Opterons is the better cache architecture of Nehalem. The inclusive cache leads to a much faster cache coherency response, and obviously the better speed of Quickpath also helps. These facts probably cause the Nehalem to scale much better with multiple sockets than ...
Source: Investors Hub - Discussion Groups More from this site Investors Hub - Discussion Groups - site profile 
Forum:  Intel  Intel - forum profile
Thread:  Show this thread (1 post) More from [i]Better relative performance of Nehalem vs Opteron[/i]  Thread Thread info: [i]Better relative performance of Nehalem vs Opteron[/i] Size: 724 bytes
Related Threads: Same Site | All Sites
Customize:  Customize "[i]Better relative performance of Nehalem vs Opteron[/i] :: Intel :: Investors Hub - Discussion Groups"
John Pryor
Started 1 week, 2 days ago (2008-12-29 22:40:00)  by DogHouseSystems
Source: Twitter / DogHouseSystems More from this site Twitter / DogHouseSystems - site profile 
Forum:  John Pryor   John Pryor  - forum profile
Thread:  Show this thread (1 post) More from BTW, Nehalem would have worked as well (Core i7 architecture). Thanks to all for the replies tonight! We'll do this again soon :)  Thread Thread info: BTW, Nehalem would have worked as well (Core i7 architecture). Thanks to all for the replies tonight! We'll do this again soon :) Size: 463 bytes
Related Threads: Same Site | All Sites
Customize:  Customize "BTW, Nehalem would have worked as well (Core i7 architecture). Thanks to all for the replies tonight! We'll do this... :: John Pryor  :: Twitter / DogHouseSystems"
Intel
Started 1 week, 2 days ago (2008-12-29 19:01:55)  by wbmw
Re: I agree, but I believe Nehalem will do more than just "win" compared to Shanghai. What we've seen so far indicates 2x Shanghai performance per core on more than one workload. That is huge... much bigger than the Harpertown leads. That is what is different. Nehalem ought to have a big lead. It's a better architecture, has more memory bandwidth, faster interconnects, and none of the drawbacks ...
Source: Investors Hub - Discussion Groups More from this site Investors Hub - Discussion Groups - site profile 
Forum:  Intel  Intel - forum profile
Thread:  Show this thread (1 post) More from Re: [i]I agree, but I believe Nehalem will  Thread Thread info: Re: [i]I agree, but I believe Nehalem will Size: 1,640 bytes
Related Threads: Same Site | All Sites
Customize:  Customize "[i]I agree, but I believe Nehalem will :: Intel :: Investors Hub - Discussion Groups"
Intel
Started 1 week, 2 days ago (2008-12-29 17:47:14)  by mas
I think the asp rising effect of Wolfdale/Penryn/Nehalem will be greater than the asp lowering effect of Atom as both sets of products ramp. I'm not sure if Q4 will be a good guide as the Recession would have killed that quarter, we need 2 consecutive quarters in the Recession with flat prices spanning them to find who's right.
Source: Investors Hub - Discussion Groups More from this site Investors Hub - Discussion Groups - site profile 
Forum:  Intel  Intel - forum profile
Thread:  Show this thread (1 post) More from I think the asp rising effect of Wolfdale/Penryn/Nehalem  Thread Thread info: I think the asp rising effect of Wolfdale/Penryn/Nehalem Size: 329 bytes
Related Threads: Same Site | All Sites
Customize:  Customize "I think the asp rising effect of Wolfdale/Penryn/Nehalem :: Intel :: Investors Hub - Discussion Groups"
Intel
Started 1 week, 2 days ago (2008-12-29 17:39:48)  by Saturn V
Nehalem..2x Shangai performance per core on more than one workload I do not recall that the single socket Nehalem outperforming Shangai by that much. The dual socket Nehalem is outperforming or equalling a 4 socket Barcelona/Shanghai. Is the Quickpath link that far superior to AMD HT ? Will a changeover to HT3 by AMD next year dramatically narrow the gap ? Or is the CPU core architecture of ...
Source: Investors Hub - Discussion Groups More from this site Investors Hub - Discussion Groups - site profile 
Forum:  Intel  Intel - forum profile
Thread:  Show this thread (1 post) More from [i]Nehalem..2x Shangai performance per core on more than  Thread Thread info: [i]Nehalem..2x Shangai performance per core on more than Size: 494 bytes
Related Threads: Same Site | All Sites
Customize:  Customize "[i]Nehalem..2x Shangai performance per core on more than :: Intel :: Investors Hub - Discussion Groups"
Intel
Started 1 week, 2 days ago (2008-12-29 17:10:05)  by mas
No as it's not just Nehalem but Penryn products too taking over completely from 65nm products. If the prices stay flat the asp will rise.
Source: Investors Hub - Discussion Groups More from this site Investors Hub - Discussion Groups - site profile 
Forum:  Intel  Intel - forum profile
Thread:  Show this thread (1 post) More from No as it's not just Nehalem but Penryn  Thread Thread info: No as it's not just Nehalem but Penryn Size: 137 bytes
Related Threads: Same Site | All Sites
Customize:  Customize "No as it's not just Nehalem but Penryn :: Intel :: Investors Hub - Discussion Groups"
Intel
Started 1 week, 3 days ago (2008-12-29 01:49:30)  by wbmw
Re: We show that Nehalem outperforms Barcelona on memory-intensive codes by a factor of two for a Nehalem node with 8 cores and a Barcelona node containing 16 cores. Further optimizations are possible with Nehalem, including the use of Simultaneous Multithreading, which improves the performance of some applications by up to 50%. Holy crap... this says it all.
Source: Investors Hub - Discussion Groups More from this site Investors Hub - Discussion Groups - site profile 
Forum:  Intel  Intel - forum profile
Thread:  Show this thread (1 post) More from Re: [i]We show that Nehalem outperforms Barcelona on  Thread Thread info: Re: [i]We show that Nehalem outperforms Barcelona on Size: 361 bytes
Related Threads: Same Site | All Sites
Customize:  Customize "[i]We show that Nehalem outperforms Barcelona on :: Intel :: Investors Hub - Discussion Groups"
Processors, RAM, Motherboards, and Overclocking
Started 1 week, 6 days ago (2008-12-25 11:15:00)  by mattmorgan
Hi, I'm planning on getting a new Intel Core i7 'Nehalem' processor, i know i need to have ddr3 ram, but i've heard that you need to have a certain amount of sticks to make it work correctly? is this true? Thanks for any help. M@
Source: PC-Media Tech Forums More from this site PC-Media Tech Forums - site profile 
Forum:  Processors, RAM, Motherboards, and Overclocking  Processors, RAM, Motherboards, and Overclocking - forum profile
Thread:  Show this thread (3 posts) More from Intel Core i7 'Nehalem' processor + Ram Set up  Thread Thread info: Intel Core i7 'Nehalem' processor + Ram Set up Size: 312 bytes
Related Threads: Same Site | All Sites
Customize:  Customize "Intel Core i7 'Nehalem' processor + Ram Set up :: Processors, RAM, Motherboards, and Overclocking :: PC-Media Tech Forums"
Started 2 weeks, 1 day ago (2008-12-23 05:25:00)  by News_PB
Why wait for the Nehalem Xeons? The single-socket server space has been a niche part of the server space, just as machines with more than four sockets has never been a particularly high volume part of the market.… Free Download - The Reg Guide to Storage and Storage Platforms More...
Source: Born4Porn More from this site Born4Porn - site profile 
Forum:  Born 4 Tech News  Born 4 Tech News - forum profile
Thread:  Show this thread (1 post) More from Visionman launches Nehalem Core i7 servers  Thread Thread info: Visionman launches Nehalem Core i7 servers Size: 581 bytes
Related Threads: Same Site | All Sites
Customize:  Customize "Visionman launches Nehalem Core i7 servers :: Born 4 Tech News :: Born4Porn"
 

Hot threads on nehalem:

Mac Pro, Power Mac
Started 4 days, 19 hours ago (2009-01-03 07:54:00)  by Tallest Skil
Quote: Originally Posted by grahamcallander The 15-inch MacBook Pro display features 1440x900-pixel resolution (or a total of 1,296,000 pixels). The last PowerBook G4 that Apple ever made featured 1440x960-pixel resolution (1,382,400 pixels). That’s a loss of 86,400 pixels, and you can tell the difference. Does anyone know ...
Source: Mac Forums - Mac News and Rumor Discussion More from this site Mac Forums - Mac News and Rumor Discussion - site profile 
Forum:  Mac Pro, Power Mac  Mac Pro, Power Mac - forum profile
Thread:  Show this thread (226 posts) More from The "Waiting for Nehalem Mac Pros" thread - Page 13 - Mac Forums  Thread Thread info: The "Waiting for Nehalem Mac Pros" thread - Page 13 - Mac Forums Size: 1,572 bytes
Related Threads: Same Site | All Sites
Customize:  Customize "RE: The "Waiting for Nehalem Mac Pros" thread - Page 13 - Mac Forums :: Mac Pro, Power Mac :: Mac Forums - Mac News and Rumor Discussion"
Xtreme Benchmark
Started 1 day, 6 hours ago (2009-01-06 20:00:00)  by rge
58C...is that load? My 24/7 temps on max load are 70C at 4.2 and 1.376v load. I realized after posting the run in pic, I actually hit 100C, see thermal LOG in red under core 1 on real temp...LOL. That one probably throttled at one point, maybe right at end, but did not affect score, have other runs that did not throttle or hit 100C with same score. I need to open a window and let some cold air...
Source: XtremeSystems Forums More from this site XtremeSystems Forums - site profile 
Forum:  Xtreme Benchmark  Xtreme Benchmark - forum profile
Thread:  Show this thread (83 posts) More from Nehalem - Gainestown - Skulltrail - Computer Chess test! - Page 5 - XtremeSystems Forums  Thread Thread info: Nehalem - Gainestown - Skulltrail - Computer Chess test! - Page 5 - XtremeSystems Forums Size: 463 bytes
Related Threads: Same Site | All Sites
Customize:  Customize "RE: Nehalem - Gainestown - Skulltrail - Computer Chess test! - Page 5 - XtremeSystems Forums :: Xtreme Benchmark :: XtremeSystems Forums"
CPUs & Motherboards
Started 1 day, 4 hours ago (2009-01-06 22:38:00)  by red_dog007
I figure in February when the DDR3 chips arrive (AM3) that prices will go down a little bit. 4 more chips will be added next month. Lower clocks and lower cache on a couple, but the other couple look just as good as what is already out. I think that these AM2+ chips are just temp, and once these AM3 chips are out, AMD will be lowering the price I would guess almost weekly to filter out ...
Source: Futuremark / YouGamers Forums More from this site Futuremark / YouGamers Forums - site profile 
Forum:  CPUs & Motherboards  CPUs & Motherboards - forum profile
Thread:  Show this thread (23 posts) More from Re: Phenom II/Yorkfield/Nehalem performance comparison  Thread Thread info: Re: Phenom II/Yorkfield/Nehalem performance comparison Size: 808 bytes
Related Threads: Same Site | All Sites
Customize:  Customize "Re: Phenom II/Yorkfield/Nehalem performance comparison :: CPUs & Motherboards :: Futuremark / YouGamers Forums"
MacBook Pro, PowerBook
Started 1 day, 11 hours ago (2009-01-06 15:41:00)  by Vtorch
Quote: Originally Posted by dinaluvsApple well i dont count sager, alienware or voodoo as notebooks. i bet their quad core mini(desktops) weigh like 15lbs and look like a brick with 1hour battery life. mainstream notebooks wont get them until battery life, size and cost are met with current specs. You ...