My account: Login | Sign Up
Loading... 

Kel-Tec Sub 2000- decent rifle or a junker??? | Thread profile

Thread profile page for "Kel-Tec Sub 2000- decent rifle or a junker???" on http://www.glocktalk.com. This report page is a snippet summary view from a single thread "Kel-Tec Sub 2000- decent rifle or a junker???", located on the Message Board at http://www.glocktalk.com. This thread profile page shows the thread statistics for: Total Authors, Total Thread Posts, and Thread Activity, which are reported in a table below. Additional thread profile information is also shown in the following ways:

1) Top Contributing Authors
2) Related Threads on "eBay Auctions"
3) Related Threads on Other Sites

Warning: These statistics are generated using 'best efforts' and can experience delays and reporting errors at times. Please note that such statistics do not constitute a thread's popularity and/or exact posting volumes at any given reporting period.

Title: Kel-Tec Sub 2000- decent rifle or a junker???
Site: Glock Talk  Glock Talk - site profile
Forum: Non-Glock Firearms  Non-Glock Firearms - forum profile
Total authors: 25 authors
Total thread posts: 35 posts
Thread activity: no new posts during last week
Domain info for: glocktalk.com

Thread posts in Kel-Tec Sub 2000- decent rifle or a junker???:

1. 
Started 1 month, 1 week ago (2008-10-07 12:29:00)  by ComputerGuy6382
I would be interested in getting a 9mm Kel-tec sub 2000 that takes 9mm Glock mags. I'm only really interested because it folds up and is compact. The gun seems pretty cheap. Would this be a good reliable piece or are they junkers??
Size: 431 bytes
Customize:  Customize "Kel-Tec Sub 2000- decent rifle or a junker??? :: Non-Glock Firearms :: Glock Talk"
2. 
Started 2 months, 1 week ago (2008-09-10 00:23:00)  by Spikehorn11
There's one in the classifieds here. http://glocktalk.com/forums/showthre...8#post11427 328
Size: 358 bytes
Customize:  Customize "<b>Reply 1</b>: Kel-Tec Sub 2000- decent rifle or a junker??? - Page 2 - Glock Talk :: Non-Glock Firearms :: Glock Talk"
3. 
Started 2 months, 1 week ago (2008-09-10 06:07:00)  by Los Suenos
Quote: Originally Posted by chewybaca67 It would be cool to have a 357 Sig replacement barrel. man, that would smoke outta' a carbine barrel! I've thought the same and believe I've figured out a way to do it. You'll need a 40 and a 9mm. Take both apart so they're in half. Bore the 9mm barrel ...
Size: 1,223 bytes
Customize:  Customize "<b>Reply 2</b>: Kel-Tec Sub 2000- decent rifle or a junker??? - Page 2 - Glock Talk :: Non-Glock Firearms :: Glock Talk"
4. 
Started 2 months, 1 week ago (2008-09-10 10:15:00)  by chewybaca67
Quote: Originally Posted by Los Suenos I've thought the same and believe I've figured out a way to do it. You'll need a 40 and a 9mm. Take both apart so they're in half. Bore the 9mm barrel side to 357. Bolt the 9mm barrel side to the 40 back end. There it is! You could never shoot 9mm again but you could shoot 40 ...
Size: 1,298 bytes
Customize:  Customize "<b>Reply 3</b>: Kel-Tec Sub 2000- decent rifle or a junker??? - Page 2 - Glock Talk :: Non-Glock Firearms :: Glock Talk"
5. 
Started 2 months, 1 week ago (2008-09-10 10:27:00)  by AJ Dual
I can't speak to the Sub 2000, but I have the earlier metal-reciever Sub-9, with S&W 5900 series magazine well, which is essentially the same thing as the 2000 but with more metal parts like the sights, and it's been flawless. I run it with the original mag, and some no-name bottom of the barrel Sportsman's Guide 30 round S&W 5900 Way back in '99 it digested an entire case of "A-...
Size: 711 bytes
Customize:  Customize "<b>Reply 4</b>: Kel-Tec Sub 2000- decent rifle or a junker??? - Page 2 - Glock Talk :: Non-Glock Firearms :: Glock Talk"
6. 
Started 1 month, 1 week ago (2008-10-07 12:33:00)  by QNman
I'm curious too...
Size: 72 bytes
Customize:  Customize "<b>Reply 5</b>: Kel-Tec Sub 2000- decent rifle or a junker??? :: Non-Glock Firearms :: Glock Talk"
7. 
Started 1 month, 1 week ago (2008-10-07 13:08:00)  by failsafe
I have a 40 cal version....I am very impressed with the weapon..With a few minor modification's, it is a viable short range , accurate pistol cal carbine..
Size: 209 bytes
Customize:  Customize "<b>Reply 6</b>: Kel-Tec Sub 2000- decent rifle or a junker??? :: Non-Glock Firearms :: Glock Talk"
8. 
Started 1 month, 1 week ago (2008-10-07 13:30:00)  by bb85cc
i have had one for around 3 years now and since the first 300-400 rounds i have not had any problems to speek of the only issue with it is that you have to keep it some what clean mine will start to jam a little after about 500-600 rounds but if i keep it clean it does not have any other problems all in all i would buy one again
Size: 393 bytes
Customize:  Customize "<b>Reply 7</b>: Kel-Tec Sub 2000- decent rifle or a junker??? :: Non-Glock Firearms :: Glock Talk"
9. 
Started 1 month, 1 week ago (2008-10-07 14:14:00)  by EDH
I have the 9mm model for a couple of years. at least 1K rds. Not a single problem. It feeds HP's of all kinds. Great Gun, and Glock mags are still pretty cheap.
Size: 214 bytes
Customize:  Customize "<b>Reply 8</b>: Kel-Tec Sub 2000- decent rifle or a junker??? :: Non-Glock Firearms :: Glock Talk"
10. 
Started 1 month, 1 week ago (2008-10-07 15:15:00)  by chewybaca67
My 40 S&W version w/Glock mags has been cool. Especially 'round these parts where it ain't hassle to toss in my Jeep for hikin'/trackin' trips in the woods or to fit in a pack pack as well. Very effective on Jack wabbits in 40S&W, bumps vel. to 10mm level. Great modern Carbine with the option of hangin' a few ninja doo-dads on too. If you don't like it, it will sell very easily. ...
Size: 501 bytes
Customize:  Customize "<b>Reply 9</b>: Kel-Tec Sub 2000- decent rifle or a junker??? :: Non-Glock Firearms :: Glock Talk"
 

Top contributing authors for Kel-Tec Sub 2000- decent rifle or a junker???

Name Posts
chewybaca67 4
patman 3
kunlao21 3
Los Suenos 2
bb85cc 2
bno762 2
Spikehorn11 1
anyplainjoe 1
GTFord1 1
AJ Dual 1